# Project Profile

- Project Name: Tensionbird
- Preferred X Username: @tensionbird
- X Bio: Know the load. Leave room. Explore collateral, borrowing and downside scenarios in a local credit planning workbench.
- Token Name: Tensionbird
- Token Ticker: TBRD
- Token Description: Tensionbird makes collateral and borrowing risk easier to explore through local stress scenarios. A proposed 1% creator tax on token trades would allocate 60% of creator-tax revenue to public educational tools and 40% to independent risk research, helping users understand assumptions before making decisions.

## Pre-launch Tweet 1

```text
Every wing carries a load. Every borrowing plan needs room for rough air.

Tensionbird is taking shape: a credit planning workbench where the margin gets a voice.
```

![Tensioned wing beam carrying three illustrative load arrows](pre-launch-1.png)

## Pre-launch Tweet 2

```text
Choose example collateral. Turn the borrowing dial. Ask what happens when the market drops.

The number changes. So does the room around it. Explore Tensionbird:
https://www.tensionbird.xyz/
```

![Borrowing dial and four-step local planning flow](pre-launch-2.png)

## Project Launch Tweet

```text
Meet Tensionbird: a local collateral and credit planning demo. Choose assets, stress the load, save a plan. No real lending.

Planned token: Tensionbird $<ticker>
CA: <ca> (not issued)
https://www.tensionbird.xyz/
```

![Tensionbird local planning demo launch diagram](project-launch.png)

## Follow-up Tweet 1

```text
Try the same collateral with a smaller borrowing ratio. How much room do you recover below the model threshold?

Move the dial and compare.
https://www.tensionbird.xyz/
```

![Two illustrative borrowing ratios on a calibrated rail](follow-up-1.png)

## Follow-up Tweet 2

```text
Two plans. Same collateral. Different borrowing ratios.

Which assumption would you challenge first, and why? Compare them in Tensionbird and bring your reasoning.
https://www.tensionbird.xyz/
```

![Two calibrated example plans at forty and sixty percent](follow-up-2.png)

## Follow-up Tweet 3

```text
A downside shock shrinks collateral. The debt in this model stays unchanged. LTV climbs.

Run a stress scenario and watch where the margin goes.
https://www.tensionbird.xyz/
```

![Illustrative LTV stress curve against a model threshold](follow-up-3.png)

## Follow-up Tweet 4

```text
A threshold is only as useful as the assumptions behind it.

Open a scenario, read the risk explanation, and tell us which assumption needs a clearer label.
https://www.tensionbird.xyz/
```

![Series of load bars beside an illustrative risk boundary](follow-up-4.png)

## Follow-up Tweet 5

```text
Keep the flight plan. Save a scenario locally, then revisit the assumptions that shaped it.

Want to discuss it? Share the example inputs you used and the result that surprised you.
https://www.tensionbird.xyz/
```

![Stack of saved scenario sheets and a local save checkmark](follow-up-5.png)

## Follow-up Tweet 6

```text
One variable at a time.

Hold borrowing steady and change the downside shock. Then reset the shock and change borrowing. Which moved the risk reading more?

Try it:
https://www.tensionbird.xyz/
```

![Two independent rails for borrowing and downside inputs](follow-up-6.png)

## Follow-up Tweet 7

```text
Where did the model lose you: an input, a threshold, or the explanation?

Try a scenario and reply with the part that made you stop. Clearer credit planning starts with a specific question.
https://www.tensionbird.xyz/
```

![Structural model connected to a question mark inspection lens](follow-up-7.png)
